Discussion (red)

Available Tissue Status

Triage (10) Editorial Accepted (8) Discussion (red) (19) Drafting Implementation (2) Verify Draft Implementation Analysis Of Compatibility Conformance Test Preparation (8) Ballot Period (1) Solution Accepted (4) Must Implement Conformance Test Verification (1) Approval (N/A) (8) Approval (Duplicate) (2) Approval (Editoral) (20) Approval (Future Improvement) (11)

Search Tissues

Search all tissues by entering a keyword.

Parts Overview

Go back to the overview of all available parts.

Part 3 (2023, Edition 2)

ID Subject Cat Status Page Clause Paragraph Created Last Comment Proposer
45 TLS 1.2 mandates support for an ECC cipher suite, but does not mandate support for the corresponding Discussion (red) 21 7.2 Table 1 22 Jun 24 27 Aug 24 C. Gordon
47 TLS 1.2 signature_algorithms support implicitly mandates the use of SHA-1 Discussion (red) 27 7.5.4 2 24 Jun 24 27 Aug 24 C. Gordon
48 TLS 1.2 requirement for active session resumption initiation lacks a rationale Discussion (red) 24 7.4.4 2 25 Jun 24 30 Sep 24 C. Gordon
49 "Session renegotiation shall be aligned with CRL update period" is ambiguous Discussion (red) 25 7.4.5 4 01 Jul 24 27 Aug 24 C. Gordon
50 Add mandatory support for extended master secret extension (RFC 7627) to TLS 1.2 Discussion (red) 1 1 1 05 Jul 24 03 Dec 24 C. Gordon
62 Is the use of not-yet-valid certificates forbidden? Discussion (red) 20 6.4.4.5 1 15 Oct 24 03 Jan 25 C. Gordon
63 Section 7.4.5 does not specify a maximum wait time for response to HelloRequest Discussion (red) 26 7.4.5 7 22 Oct 24 08 Jan 25 C. Gordon
65 IEC 62351-3 X509, CRL, OCSP requirements vs. IEC 62351-9 Discussion (red) 18 6.4.4.1 1 04 Nov 24 08 Jan 25 C. Gordon
80 Verification based upon individual certificates - mandatory Discussion (red) 18 6.4.4.3 1 25 Nov 24 08 Jan 25 S. Pini
88 Section 7.3 defines an event at the "alarm" level but Table A.1 defines the same as "warning" Discussion (red) 22 7.3 3-4 03 Dec 24 08 Jan 25 C. Gordon
89 The case of a not-yet-valid CRL is not handled Discussion (red) 20 6.4.4.4.2 1 04 Dec 24 03 Jan 25 C. Gordon
91 Some Table A.2 TLS events violate the 62351-14 mnemonic naming scheme Discussion (red) 47 Table A.1 Table A.1 09 Dec 24 03 Jan 25 C. Gordon
93 Clarification request: does the detection of a revoked X509 lead to TLS session retirement? Discussion (red) 19 6.4.4.4.1 2 19 Dec 24 03 Jan 25 C. Gordon

Part 4 (2018, Edition 1.1)

96 Replace references to OSI-SecAsso by the correct ones Discussion (red) 69, 76 15.3.2, 15.6.3 last 17 Jan 25 today 09:20 S. Fries
97 attCert treatment ambiguous Discussion (red) 51 13.3.1.1.k 1 19 Jan 25 today 15:05 T. Stone

Part 6 (2020, Edition 1)

2 Clarification on SV header attributes Ed2 Discussion (red) 11 7.2.2.5.2 3,4,5,6 04 Sep 13 31 May 23 M. Ridwan
10 Set stamachine variable to invalid Discussion (red) 13 6.2.1.1 state 2) 04 May 22 31 May 23 M. Lacroix
13 Problem in GOOSE state machine Discussion (red) 14 6.2.1.1 state 11) 04 May 22 30 Jun 23 M. Lacroix
21 Table 6 to be revised Discussion (red) 28 11.2.1 Table 6 16 May 22 12 Feb 24 M. Lacroix

 

Privacy | Contact | Disclaimer

Tissue DB v. 24.12.6.1