30   Correct TLS extension name

Created: 17 Jul 2023

Status: Approval (Editoral)

Part: Part 3 (2023, Edition 2)

Links:

Page: 28

Clause: 7.5.5.2

Paragraph: 4

Issue

It would increase readability to include the extension name in the following sentence was commented during FDIS commenting period for the statement:

“An implementation claiming conformance to this document shall support this extension according to RFC 6066.”

it was changed to

"An implementation claiming conformance to this document shall support the status_request_v2 extension according to RFC 6066."
The reference to "status_request_v2" is wrong here and should state "status_request"

Proposal

Proposal to correct to intended extension "status_request".

Discussion Created Status
- Approved during WG15 Meeting 10/2023, based on previous FDIS comment resolution discussion
- Proposal accepted 		19 Oct 23 Approval (Editoral)
I am OK with this correction in the text. 08 Aug 23 Discussion (red)
Proposal according to FDIS comment resolution 26 Jul 23 Discussion (red)
Proposal according to FDIS comment resolution 26 Jul 23 Accepted
Accepted in FDIS comment resolution an WG15 meeting in May 2023 19 Jul 23 Accepted
Proposal to change text to original proposal for comment resolution:

An implementation claiming conformance to this document shall support the status_request extension according to RFC 6066.
17 Jul 23 Triage

 

Privacy | Contact | Disclaimer

Tissue DB v. 23.12.13.1